Objective 01Compute φPn,max (short column)
Tied: 0.80·φ·[0.85 f'c(Ag−Ast) + fy·Ast], φ=0.65. Spiral: 0.85·φ·[…], φ=0.75.
- Why it matters
- Baseline pure-axial capacity.
- Where it is used
- Every column check.
- Connects to
- ACI 22.4.2.
A century of steel — from concept to skyline

Concrete crushes; steel yields. Together they carry a column.
φPn,max = 0.80·φ·[0.85·f'c·(Ag − Ast) + fy·Ast] for tied; ×0.85 for spiral.
Chapter 26 covers short RC columns under axial and P–M interaction: tied vs spiral detailing, φPn,max, and the P–M interaction diagram.
What you will be able to do after finishing Chapter 1 — and why each objective matters in practice
Objective 01Tied: 0.80·φ·[0.85 f'c(Ag−Ast) + fy·Ast], φ=0.65. Spiral: 0.85·φ·[…], φ=0.75.
Objective 02Ties resist rebar buckling laterally; spirals also confine the core and boost ductility.
Objective 031% ≤ ρg = Ast/Ag ≤ 8% (typically ≤ 4% for constructability).
Objective 04Points: pure axial (top), balanced (P = Pb, M = Mb), pure flexure (bottom).
Objective 05Short if klu/r ≤ 22 (unbraced) or ≤ 34 − 12·M1/M2 (braced).
Objective 06Pick c, compute As, plot on P–M interaction, iterate.
What each part of a steel-frame building actually does — and why it exists
Before you design any single member, you have to see the whole system. A steel-frame building is not a collection of independent shapes bolted together — it is a deliberate load path, engineered so that every kilonewton of gravity, wind, or seismic demand has a continuous route from where it starts to the ground where the earth can resist it.
The photograph below shows a typical steel framing detail. Drag each labelled chip onto the structural element it names — the drop is only accepted when it lands inside the correct element's outlined region. A correct answer locks in with a green outline and a short explanation; a wrong answer flashes the region red, tells you what you actually hit, and returns the chip so you can try again. Press Reveal expected placements to see the reference solution (that attempt is then marked as assisted).

Why we design the way we do — six ways steel structures have failed, and what each disaster taught the profession
Every provision in AISC 360 is a scar. Behind each equation, load factor, and detailing rule is a bridge, a walkway, or a tower whose failure cost lives and rewrote the profession. The six case studies below trace the mechanisms that motivate the code you are about to learn.
Read each one as an engineer, not a spectator: identify the load, the limit state, the missing check, and the specific clause that exists today because that check was missed. When you meet those clauses again in Chapters 5–17, they will read as answers, not rules.

Cover spalls; longitudinal bars buckle between ties.
Ties too widely spaced.

Long column bows out under axial + lateral load.
Slenderness > 22 (unbraced) not treated.
Design codes intervene at the transition from yield to instability. Everything before yield is elastic and reversible; everything after instability is a race to collapse. LRFD keeps the demand well below the first transition.
The full textbook chapter — figures, equations, and engineering narrative
A one-way slab is really a wide, shallow beam. Why do we still add temperature and shrinkage steel perpendicular to the main reinforcement, and what cracking pattern would you see if we left it out?
Design a 1-ft (12-in) wide strip as a rectangular beam with b = 12 in and d = h − cover − db/2. Every equation from Chapter 22 (flexure) still applies; only the units change (moment per foot, steel area per foot).
Values above assume normal-weight concrete and Grade 60 steel. Multiply h by 1.65 − 0.005·wc (pcf) for lightweight concrete; by (0.4 + fy/100,000) for higher-grade steel.
Provided perpendicular to primary steel to control cracking from temperature and shrinkage strains. Spacing s ≤ min(5h, 18 in).
One-way slab practice


ABET / licensure link. These points map to ABET Student Outcomes 2 and 4 — engineering design within realistic constraints, and recognition of ethical and professional responsibilities. Expect NCEES FE and PE exam questions on the NSPE Code of Ethics, OSHA construction requirements, and the engineer's standard of care.
Slab cost per square foot
| Line item | Qty | Rate | Cost |
|---|---|---|---|
Concrete (7″) | 21.6 yd³ | $165 | $3,564 |
Formwork + shoring | 1000 ft² | $8 | $7,500 |
Reinforcement (main + T&S) | 1.1 ton | $2,200 | $2,420 |
Place, finish, cure | 1000 ft² | $3 | $2,600 |
| Estimated total | $16,084 | ||
Takeaway. ≈$15.9/ft² installed — shaving 1″ of thickness saves about $0.55/ft² plus foundation savings.
Unit rates are representative US averages for teaching purposes. On a real project, price with current local rates (RSMeans, fabricator quotes, or contractor pricing) and state the estimate date.
Key mechanics visualised — watch the strain profile, stress block, or buckled shape evolve
Under axial load, tied cores spall and lose capacity abruptly (φ=0.65). Spiral cores stay confined and remain ductile (φ=0.75).
Full-page reference diagrams — the visual vocabulary you will use for the rest of the course

Tied columns: 0.80·Pmax factor, φ=0.65.

Spirals confine and boost ductility.

Tie spacing critical.

P-δ magnifies moments.
Full textbook solutions — problem, theory, step-by-step, verification, interpretation
Compute the accidental-eccentricity-capped design axial capacity.
A short 16×16 in tied column has 4 #8 bars (Ast = 3.14 in²), f'c = 4 ksi, fy = 60 ksi. Compute φPn,max.

Pure Pn is capped by 0.80 (tied) or 0.85 (spiral) to account for accidental eccentricity; then multiplied by φ.
ρg in allowable band and Pn cap correctly applied.
Compute the governing variables — hints unlock as you need them
A 14-in-diameter circular SPIRAL column has 6 #6 longitudinal bars (A_st = 2.64 in²), f'c = 4 ksi, f_y = 60 ksi. Compute A_g, ρ_g, P_o, and φP_n,max per ACI §22.4.2, then compare with an equivalent tied section.
Solve the chapter's design task — compute each governing variable
A 16 in × 16 in tied RC column is reinforced with eight #8 longitudinal bars (Ast = 6.32 in²). Compute the nominal axial capacity at zero eccentricity P0, the code cap Pn,max = 0.80·P0 (tied), and the design axial strength φPn,max.
Pick the column configuration that satisfies strength, ρg, and detailing
Design a short RC column for P_u = 480 k, f'c = 4 ksi, f_y = 60 ksi. Compare a 16×16 tied square against a 14-in spiral. Check φP_n,max, ρ_g limits, minimum bar count, tie/spiral detailing, AND ductility posture.
A mind map of how every concept connects
These questions reference ACI 318-19 — sections, equations, and tables are cited explicitly. Use a calculator. Each question offers a clue you may reveal before answering. Submissions are recorded to your account once signed in.
Attach your handwritten or typed step-by-step solution for this chapter's graded quiz. The instructor can download every submission. PDF only, up to 25 MB.
Your file — PDF, Word document, scanned handwriting or a photo — is read page by page like an experienced structural engineering instructor would. The scan is validated first, then your reasoning, structural model, calculations, diagrams, code basis and final answers are graded on process, not just the final number. Design work is additionally reviewed against AISC 360-22 and ACI 318-19. Partial credit applies, and one early mistake carried correctly forward is only penalized once.
NCEES-style practice with timer, equation sheet, and mastery tracking
For a 16×16 tied column, Ast=3.14, f'c=4, fy=60 ksi. φPn,max is closest to: