15

Moment Connections

Why Structural Steel?

Welded and bolted fully-restrained moment connections.

⏱ 110 min★ Advanced✎ 3 objectives
§01Section 01

Engineering story

Engineering story
Chapter 15 · Moment Connections

Welded and bolted fully-restrained moment connections.

A real project narrative for this chapter will be authored as this chapter migrates to the v3.0 structured schema.

§02Section 02

Learning objectives

After this chapter you will be able to
  • Design a bolted end-plate moment connection
  • Check panel-zone strength
  • Detail welded FR connections
§03Section 03

Engineering motivation

§04Section 04

Failure mechanisms

Failure mechanisms & lessons learned

Photographs and lessons-learned case studies for this topic will be added during chapter migration.

AISC Reference Box
  • AISC 360-22 — Specification chapter governing this topic
  • AISC Manual 16th Ed. — Design tables and worked examples

Why This Chapter Matters

Moment connections make a moment frame work. The pre-Northridge W1994 welded flange–bolted web detail failed brittly under seismic loading; modern prequalified detailing (RBS, BFP, WUF-W per AISC 358) is now required.

Learning Objectives

  • Distinguish simple, partially restrained (PR), and fully restrained (FR) connections.
  • Design a bolted flange-plate (BFP) FR moment connection per AISC 358.
  • Check panel-zone shear at the column web (AISC J10.6).
  • Detail continuity plates and doubler plates when required.
  • Understand the Northridge lesson and the role of prequalified connections.

Where This Chapter Is Used

Moment-frame columns in Chapters 17 and 19 and the seismic-force-resisting system of the capstone.

ANSI / AISC 360-22Specification for Structural Steel Buildings16.1-121 to 16.1-150
Chapter
J
AISC 360-22

Chapter J. Design of Connections — Moment Connections

Use this reference to flip directly to the correct page of the AISC 360-22 Specification while solving problems in this course chapter.

§Section titlePage
J1.2Simple, PR, and FR Connections16.1-121
J2Welds (CJP for FR moment connections)16.1-124
J10.6Panel Zone Web Shear16.1-148
J10.7Continuity Plates & Doubler Plates16.1-149

Companion reference: AISC 358 — Prequalified Moment Connections (RBS, BFP, WUF-W) & Manual Part 12

Lecture Notes

Chapter 15 — Moment Connections (AISC 360-22 §J10 / AISC 358)

Chapter focus. A moment connection has to do something a shear connection never attempts: transfer the entire flexural moment of the beam into the column while keeping the joint rotation small enough that the frame behaves the way the analysis assumed. That single requirement forces engineers to check an entire family of column-side limit states that don't exist for simple shear tabs — flange bending, web crippling, web buckling, and panel-zone shear — and to think carefully about whether the connection is actually as rigid as the model says it is. This chapter builds that vocabulary from the ground up: how connections are classified, how the moment gets idealized into flange forces, what breaks on the column side, and how AISC 358 pre-qualifies specific details for seismic use.

1. Classifying Connections: FR, PR, and Simple

Every beam-to-column connection has some moment-rotation (M–θ) relationship. AISC 360-22 Commentary §B3.4 sorts connections into three families based on how that curve compares to the beam's own flexural stiffness EI/L:

  • Simple (pinned) — the connection transmits negligible moment; it is designed to allow the beam ends to rotate freely under gravity load. Initial rotational stiffness is roughly ≤ 2EI/L. Single-plate shear tabs and double angles fall here (Chapter 14).
  • Fully restrained (FR) — the connection is stiff enough that the angle between beam and column axes essentially does not change under load; initial stiffness ≥ 20EI/L. The analysis can assume full continuity — the beam behaves as if rigidly built into the column.
  • Partially restrained (PR) — anything between the two extremes. A PR connection carries a meaningful moment but also rotates a meaningful amount, and that flexibility must be included explicitly in the frame analysis as a rotational spring with a known M–θ curve.

Classifying a connection is not optional bookkeeping — it changes the frame analysis. If you analyze the frame assuming FR joints but detail a connection that is actually PR, the real beam moments and column moments will differ from what you designed for, and the real drift will be larger than predicted.

M–θ Connection Classification (AISC 360-22 Comm. B3.4) θ (joint rotation) M FR — rigid (M/θ ≥ 20 EI/L) PR — partially restrained Simple / pinned (M/θ ≤ 2 EI/L) Mp,beam (beam capacity)
Figure 15.1 — M–θ classification. FR connections track the steep rigid line; simple connections track the shallow pinned line; PR connections fall on a curve between the two and must be modeled as springs.

2. Directly Welded Flange Connections

The most direct way to make a moment connection is to weld the beam flanges straight to the column flange with complete-joint-penetration (CJP) groove welds, and to connect the web with a bolted shear tab (which carries only shear — the flanges carry essentially all of the moment). This was the standard pre-Northridge (1994) special moment frame detail; after several welded flange connections fractured brittlely in that earthquake, AISC 358 added supplemental requirements (weld access hole geometry, backing bar removal, CVN toughness of filler metal, continuity plates) before this detail can be used in seismic special or intermediate moment frames. In ordinary (non-seismic, wind-only) moment frames it remains an efficient, economical detail.

Directly welded flange moment connection — CJP flanges, bolted/welded shear tab web column flange beam web (shear tab, bolted) CJP groove weld CJP groove weld continuity plate (if req'd) d − tf M_u
Figure 15.2 — Directly welded flange connection: CJP groove welds transfer the flange forces; the web shear tab carries the beam shear only.

3. Force-Couple Idealization

To design the flange welds, plates, and bolts, and to check the column, the beam's bending moment must be converted into discrete forces that act at the flange locations. The standard AISC idealization treats the entire moment as an equal-and-opposite pair of axial forces acting at the flange centroids, separated by the lever arm (d − tf):

Force-couple idealizationPuf = Mu / (d − tf)
  • Mu — factored moment at the connection (often taken at the column face, or at the plastic hinge location for seismic RBS details).
  • d — beam depth; tf — beam flange thickness; (d − tf) approximates the distance between flange centroids.
  • Puf — the tension (or compression) flange force used to size welds, flange plates, bolt groups, and column-side limit states.

This idealization ignores the small moment carried by the web, which is conservative for design of the flange connection and is the universal starting point in AISC design examples.

Force-couple idealization of the beam moment P_uf (tension flange) P_uf (compression flange) d − tf P_uf = M_u / (d − t_f) — the entire flexural moment is idealized as an equal, opposite pair of flange forces
Figure 15.3 — Force-couple idealization: the beam moment becomes an equal, opposite pair of flange forces P_uf separated by (d − t_f).

4. Bolted Flange-Plate (BFP) Connections

A bolted flange-plate connection welds a plate to the column flange in the shop, then field-bolts the beam flange to that plate — combining a reliable shop weld with a fast, tolerant field bolted splice. AISC 358 Chapter 7 pre-qualifies this detail for seismic use. Design requires four separate checks, each on the load path from beam flange → bolts → plate → weld:

  1. Bolt group in the beam-flange-to-plate splice: shear, bearing, tearout under Puf (Chapter 12/14 methods).
  2. Plate tension yielding: φtFyAg, φt = 0.90 (Eq. J4-1 / D2-1).
  3. Plate tension rupture through the bolt holes: φtFuAe, φt = 0.75 (Eq. D2-2).
  4. Compression-side plate buckling: the compression flange plate is a short, stocky column between the column face and the first bolt row — check as a compression member per §E3 (often KL/r is small enough that Fcr ≈ Fy, but always verify).
Bolted flange-plate (BFP) moment connection flange plate (welded to column, bolted to beam flange) P_uf transferred plate → bolts → beam flange
Figure 15.4 — Bolted flange-plate connection: shop weld to column, field-bolted splice to beam flange.

5. Extended End-Plate Connections

An extended end-plate connection shop-welds a thick steel plate to the beam end, extending it beyond the flanges, then field-bolts the plate to the column flange with pretensioned high-strength bolts. AISC 358 Chapter 6 pre-qualifies four-bolt unstiffened (4E), four-bolt stiffened (4ES), and eight-bolt stiffened (8ES) geometries. The plate must be thick enough to force the bolts (not the plate) to be the ductile limit, and thin enough to avoid an oversized, uneconomical connection — this is governed by yield-line theory (§9 below).

6. Column-Side Limit States (§J10)

Every flange force Puf delivered to the column must be checked against the column's own local capacity — a concentrated load applied to a thin flange and web can locally yield, crush, or buckle the column long before the global column strength is threatened. AISC 360-22 §J10 defines five limit states for this "concentrated force" problem, which apply on both sides of a moment connection:

6.1 Flange Local Bending (§J10.1)

A tension flange force pulls the column flange toward the beam, bending it like a plate about the column web. If the column flange is thin relative to its width, it deforms enough to load only the region near the web, wasting the outer part of the beam flange.

Eq. J10-1, φ = 0.90Rn = 6.25 Fyf tf²

where Fyf and tf are the column flange yield stress and thickness. If Puf exceeds φRn, a continuity plate is required opposite the tension flange.

6.2 Web Local Yielding (§J10.2)

The concentrated flange force spreads through the column web at a 2.5:1 slope from the point of application; if the resulting web stress exceeds Fyw, the web yields locally.

Eq. J10-2, φ = 1.00 (interior load)Rn = Fyw tw (5 kdes + N)

N is the bearing length (here, the beam flange thickness) and kdes is the design distance from the column outer face to the web toe of the fillet.

6.3 Web Local Crippling (§J10.3)

Crippling is a localized buckling/crushing failure of the web directly under the concentrated compression flange force, distinct from the yielding check above; it typically governs for thinner webs.

Eq. J10-4 (N/d > 0.2), φ = 0.75Rn = 0.40 tw² [ 1 + (4N/d − 0.2)(tw/tf)1.5 ] √(EFywtf/tw)

6.4 Web Compression Buckling (§J10.5)

When compression flange forces are applied to both flanges of the column at the same location (as at an interior beam-column joint), the entire web between the two forces can buckle like a column plate.

Eq. J10-8, φ = 0.90Rn = 24 tw³ √(EFyw) / h
Column-side limit states at the tension/compression flange (§J10) 1. Flange local bending (J10.1) 2. Web local yielding (J10.2) 3. Web local crippling (J10.3) 4. Web compression buckling (J10.5) 5. Panel-zone shear (J10.6) beam flange force P_uf
Figure 15.5 — Column-side limit states at a moment connection: flange local bending, web local yielding, web local crippling, web compression buckling, and panel-zone shear all check the same flange force P_uf against a different column failure mode.

7. Panel-Zone Shear (§J10.6)

The panel zone is the rectangle of column web bounded by the beam flanges (depth dc, thickness tw). At an interior joint, the flange forces from beams framing in on both sides of the column act in the same rotational sense on the panel zone, generating a shear far larger than the shear in the column shaft above or below. Left unchecked, this shear causes a diamond-shaped shear distortion of the joint that concentrates rotation right where the beam plastic hinge is trying to form — a major contributor to pre-Northridge connection failures.

Eq. J10-9 (Pr ≤ 0.4Pc), φv = 0.90Rn = 0.60 Fy dc tw
Eq. J10-11 (including web restraint), Pr ≤ 0.4PcRn = 0.60 Fy dc tw [ 1 + 3 bcf tcf² / (db dc tw) ]

where bcf, tcf are the column flange width/thickness, db the beam depth, and dc the column depth. If φvRn < the panel-zone shear demand (approximately Puf,left + Puf,right − Vcolumn), a doubler plate is required to add web area.

Panel-zone free body — flange forces from both sides create shear in d_c × t_w panel zone d_c × t_w P_uf (left beam) P_uf (right beam, reversed) column above column below shear distortion
Figure 15.6 — Panel-zone free body at an interior joint: flange forces from both sides act in the same rotational sense, producing shear in the d_c × t_w web rectangle.

8. Continuity Plates and Doubler Plates

  • Continuity plates are horizontal stiffener plates welded across the column web, aligned with the beam flanges, added whenever flange local bending or web local yielding/crippling capacity is insufficient. They give the flange force a stiff load path straight through the column and restore flange-bending stiffness.
  • Minimum continuity plate thickness (AISC Design Guide 13 / 358) is typically tcp ≥ tbf/2 (one-sided connection) or ≥ tbf (two-sided), and plates are CJP- or fillet-welded to both column flanges and the web, sized to develop the unbalanced flange force.
  • Doubler plates add web area (and hence shear capacity) to the panel zone when §J10.6 governs. They are placed against the column web (either side) and welded around the perimeter, with a required minimum thickness so the composite web thickness (tw + td) satisfies Rn ≥ demand.
  • In seismic SMF/IMF construction, doubler plates and continuity plates additionally must satisfy AISC 341 detailing rules for welding sequence and plug welds to avoid introducing new fatigue-critical details.

9. Yield-Line Theory for End Plates (AISC 358 §6)

An extended end plate loaded in tension by the beam flange force does not fail by simple bending about one line — it fails along a pattern of plastic hinge ("yield") lines that forms around the bolt holes and the beam flange, redistributing moment across the whole plate width. AISC 358 tabulates the yield-line parameter Yp (a function of bolt gage, pitch, and plate width) for each pre-qualified end-plate geometry, and the required plate thickness comes directly from equating the internal virtual work of the yield-line mechanism to the external work of the flange force:

AISC 358 Eq. 6.9-11tp,req = √( 1.11 γr Puf pf / (φ Fpy Yp) )
  • γr — bolt row factor accounting for prying uplift (=1.0 for outer bolt row on most configurations).
  • pf — distance from the flange face to the near bolt row (a "gage" dimension in the yield-line pattern).
  • Yp — yield-line mechanism parameter, in inches, from the AISC 358 tables for the specific bolt pattern (4E, 4ES, 8ES) — larger Yp means a stiffer mechanism and a thinner plate is adequate.
  • Fpy — end-plate yield stress; φ = 0.90.

Physically: if tp ≥ tp,req, the plate stays essentially elastic and all inelastic deformation localizes safely in the bolts and the beam (thick-plate / ductile-bolt design philosophy). If the plate is thinner than required, it yields first, and — especially cyclically — plate yield-line hinging is far less predictable than bolt yielding, so AISC 358 does not allow a "thin-plate, ductile-plate" design philosophy for its pre-qualified details.

Additional Design Aids & Stratified Equations

4-bolt extended end-plate — yield-line pattern beam flange Yp yield-line length used in AISC 358 Eq. 6.9-11
End-plate yield-line pattern. Y_p is the geometric parameter derived from equating internal (yield-line) and external (P_uf) virtual work.
Bolt tension with pryingT_u = P_uf/n_b + Q (prying force Q per AISC Manual Part 9)
Design philosophyt_p ≥ t_p,req forces ductility into the bolts, not the plate

10. Prequalified Seismic Connections — AISC 358 Overview

For special (SMF) and intermediate (IMF) moment frames, AISC 341 requires the moment connection to be either (a) qualified by cyclic testing per Appendix S/K1, or (b) selected from AISC 358's list of pre-qualified connections, each with its own chapter of prescriptive design rules:

AISC 358 Ch.ConnectionKey featureFrame types
5Reduced Beam Section (RBS)"Dogbone" flange cutout forces the plastic hinge away from the column faceSMF, IMF
6Bolted Extended End-Plate (4E/4ES/8ES)Field-bolted; thick-plate/ductile-bolt designSMF, IMF
7Bolted Flange Plate (BFP)Shop weld + field bolt spliceSMF, IMF
8Welded Unreinforced Flange–Welded Web (WUF-W)Improved post-Northridge welded-flange detailIMF only
9Kaiser Bolted Bracket (KBB)Cast bracket bolted to beam & column flangesSMF, IMF
10ConXtech ConXLProprietary collar/pin moment connectionSMF, IMF
11Simpson Strong-Tie Yield-LinkReplaceable yielding fuse platesSMF, IMF

Pre-qualification means the connection has documented cyclic test data over the applicable range of beam/column sizes; the designer follows the chapter's step-by-step procedure rather than re-deriving the design from first principles. All of these connections still require the §J10 column-side checks and panel-zone check from this chapter — pre-qualification governs the beam-side detail, not the column.

11. Summary of φ Factors and Limit States

Limit stateAISC Eq.φTypically governs when…
Flange local bendingJ10-10.90Thin column flange, no continuity plates
Web local yieldingJ10-2/31.00Thin, deep column web
Web local cripplingJ10-4/50.75Compression flange, slender web
Web compression bucklingJ10-80.90Interior joint, opposing compression forces
Panel-zone shearJ10-9/110.90Deep beams into light columns; strong-column weak-panel
End-plate flexure (yield line)AISC 358 6.9-110.90Thin plate, small pf
Bolt tension (with prying)J3-1 / Manual Pt. 90.75Small bolt diameter, thin plate (large prying)

12. Design Workflow — Moment Connection

  1. Classify the connection intent (FR/PR/simple) and confirm it matches the frame analysis model.
  2. Compute Mu and Vu at the connection (column face, or hinge location for RBS/seismic details).
  3. Idealize flange force: Puf = Mu/(d − tf).
  4. Design the beam-side detail (weld, flange plate + bolts, or end plate + bolts) for Puf.
  5. If end plate: size tp from yield-line theory; check bolt tension with prying.
  6. Check all five column-side §J10 limit states for Puf against the column flange/web.
  7. Check panel-zone shear (§J10.6); add doubler plate if needed.
  8. Add continuity plates if flange bending or web yielding/crippling governs.
  9. For seismic frames, confirm the whole detail matches an AISC 358 pre-qualified geometry and detailing limits.

⚠ Common mistakes

  • Assuming FR behavior without verifying rotational stiffness (K > 20 EI/L) — the frame analysis and the connection detail must agree.
  • Skipping panel-zone shear — a leading contributor to pre-Northridge (1994) connection failures.
  • Using snug-tightened bolts where AISC 358 requires pretensioned (slip-critical class) bolts.
  • Forgetting continuity plates when the column flange is too thin for the concentrated flange force (§J10.1).
  • Designing a thin, "ductile" end plate for a seismic connection — AISC 358 requires the thick-plate/ductile-bolt philosophy instead.
  • Ignoring the doubling effect at interior joints, where two opposing beams both dump flange force into the same panel zone simultaneously.
Exam / FE tips. Memorize the force-couple idealization Puf = Mu/(d − tf) — it is the entry point to nearly every moment-connection problem. On multi-part problems, work column-side limit states in the order flange bending → web yielding → web crippling → panel-zone shear; the governing one is rarely the first you check. Panel-zone shear uses the column web thickness and depth (dc, tw), not the beam's.

📖 Using the AISC Manual — Moment Connections

Companion reference: Manual Part 12 (FR moment connections) + Design Guides 4 (extended end-plate) & 16 (flush end-plate). In practice, engineers rarely compute every quantity from first principles — the AISC Steel Construction Manual (16th Ed.) tabulates φRn (or Rn/Ω) for every rolled shape so you can pick a member in seconds. Formulas remain essential for understanding, verifying, and for anything the tables do not cover.

Fully-restrained moment connections have too many geometry variables for a single 2-D table, so the Manual gives step-by-step design procedures keyed to worked examples in Part 12 rather than pre-computed φRn tables. However:

  • Table 12-1 tabulates flange-weld strength per weld size for direct-welded flange connections.
  • Design Guide 4 (4-bolt & 8-bolt extended end-plate) has a fill-in-the-blank spreadsheet template with every limit state.
  • AISC 358 (Prequalified Seismic Connections) tabulates every dimension for RBS, WUF-W, and end-plate moment connections — you copy the geometry, do not design it.
Table vs. formula — which to use? Use tables to select a shape quickly. Use formulas to verify odd geometry, non-standard grades (Fy≠50 ksi), unusual K-factors or Lb, and to answer exam problems that hand you a section not in the current Manual.
Mu, VuFR welded-flange / bolted-web (continuity plates)
Fully-restrained moment connection: CJP flange welds + bolted shear tab + continuity plates.

Formula Sheet

NameEquationAISC Ref
Design strengthφ Rn ≥ RuAISC 360-22 B3.1

Worked Example

Chapter 15 — Worked Examples (Moment Connections)

All four examples follow the AISC v16.0 Design Examples format (adapted from the connection philosophy in Examples II.A-1B/II.A-2B) — material/geometric properties first, then limit states in the order the load travels: beam flange → connector → column.

Worked Example 15.1 — Directly Welded Flange Moment Connection

Adapted from AISC Design Examples V16.0 methodology (§J10 column-side checks, per Manual Part 11 & Design Guide 13).

Given

  • Beam: W24×76, A992 (Fy=50, Fu=65 ksi). d=23.9 in, tf=0.68 in, bf=8.99 in.
  • Column: W14×132, A992. dc=14.7 in, tw=0.645 in, bcf=14.7 in, tcf=1.03 in, kdes=1.72 in.
  • Mu = 420 k-ft (at column face), Vu = 40 kips.
  • CJP groove welds, both flanges; web via bolted shear tab (Ch. 14 methods, not repeated here).
Ex 15.1 — Directly Welded Flange Connection, W24×76 into W14×132M_u = 420 k-ft, V_u = 40 k, CJP flange welds
Figure 15.1a — Directly welded flange connection geometry.

Step 1 — Flange Force

Force-couple idealizationPuf = Mu / (d − tf)
Puf = 420(12) / (23.9 − 0.68) = 5040 / 23.22 = 217 kips

Step 2 — CJP Flange Weld

A complete-joint-penetration groove weld matched to the beam flange (FEXX = 70 ksi, matching filler per AWS D1.8) develops the full tensile strength of the flange automatically — per AISC 360-22 §J2.6, a CJP weld's strength equals the strength of the base metal joined; no separate weld-size calculation is required, only NDT (UT) inspection and demand-critical filler metal (AWS D1.8) for seismic applications.
Base metal check, §J4.1φRn = φFy·(bftf) = 0.90(50)(8.99×0.68) = 275 kips ≥ 217 ✓

Step 3 — Column Flange Local Bending (J10.1)

Eq. J10-1, φ=0.90φRn = φ·6.25 Fyf tcf²
φRn = 0.90(6.25)(50)(1.03)² = 0.90(6.25)(50)(1.061) = 298 kips ≥ 217 ✓ (no continuity plate required for this limit state)

Step 4 — Column Web Local Yielding (J10.2)

Eq. J10-2, φ=1.00, interior loadφRn = φFywtw(5kdes + N)
N = tbf = 0.68 in.
φRn = 1.00(50)(0.645)[5(1.72)+0.68] = 32.25(9.28) = 299 kips ≥ 217 ✓

Step 5 — Column Web Local Crippling (J10.3)

Eq. J10-4 (N/d ≤ 0.2), φ=0.75Rn = 0.80tw²[1+3(N/d)(tw/tcf)1.5]√(EFywtcf/tw)
N/d = 0.68/14.7 = 0.046 ≤ 0.2.
Rn = 0.80(0.645)²[1+3(0.046)(0.645/1.03)1.5]√(29000·50·1.03/0.645)
= 0.416[1+0.0544]√(2,313,000) = 0.416(1.054)(1521) = 667 kips; φRn = 0.75(667) = 500 kips ≥ 217 ✓

Step 6 — Panel-Zone Shear (J10.6)

Eq. J10-9, φv=0.90Rn = 0.60Fydctw
Rn = 0.60(50)(14.7)(0.645) = 284.6 kips; φRn = 0.90(284.6) = 256 kips ≥ 217 (single-side connection, no doubling) ✓
Limit stateφRn (k)Demand Puf (k)Status
Flange base metal (CJP)275217OK
Column flange local bending298217OK
Column web local yielding299217OK
Column web local crippling500217OK
Panel-zone shear256217Governs — OK
All §J10 limit states satisfied with no continuity plates and no doubler plate; panel-zone shear governs at DCR = 217/256 = 0.85. CJP flange welds with UT inspection; bolted shear tab for V_u = 40 k per Chapter 14.

Engineering interpretation. Panel-zone shear governed even though it had the least margin among the five checks — this is typical because panel-zone capacity scales with dctw, while a heavy W14 column already has a thick flange giving generous bending/yielding/crippling capacity.

Common mistakes: using the beam's d and tw instead of the column's in the panel-zone equation; forgetting that a CJP weld needs no separate strength calc but does need demand-critical filler metal and UT for seismic; skipping kdes lookup and guessing k1.

Worked Example 15.2 — Bolted Flange-Plate Moment Connection

Adapted from AISC 358 Ch. 7 (BFP) design procedure; bolt-group and plate checks follow AISC Manual Part 7/9 methodology as in Examples II.A-1B/II.A-2B.

Given

  • Beam: W21×62, A992. d=21.0 in, tf=0.615 in, bf=8.24 in.
  • Mu = 310 k-ft at column face.
  • Flange plates: A572 Gr. 50, PL ¾×8 in, welded to column, field-bolted to beam flange with 3 rows of ⅞-in A325-SC (slip-critical) bolts.
Ex 15.2 — Bolted Flange-Plate Connection, W21×62M_u = 310 k-ft; PL 3/4×8 flange plates, 3 rows 7/8" A325-SC bolts
Figure 15.2a — Bolted flange-plate connection: flange force through the plate splice.

Step 1 — Flange Force

Puf = Mu / (d − tf)
Puf = 310(12) / (21.0 − 0.615) = 3720/20.39 = 182.4 kips

Step 2 — Bolt Group (6 bolts, 2 per row × 3 rows, double shear not applicable — single shear through plate)

Table 7-1, ⅞-in A325-SC, single shear, STD holesφrn = 24.3 kips/bolt
φRn = 6(24.3) = 146 kips < 182.4 NG — add a 4th row (8 bolts total): φRn = 8(24.3) = 194 kips ≥ 182.4 ✓

Step 3 — Plate Tension Yielding (Eq. J4-1)

φ=0.90φRn = φFyAg = 0.90(50)(0.75×8)
φRn = 0.90(50)(6.0) = 270 kips ≥ 182.4 ✓

Step 4 — Plate Tension Rupture (Eq. D2-2)

φ=0.75, An = (8 − 2×1.0)(0.75), holes ⅞+⅛=1.0 inφRn = φFuAe, Ae=An(U=1.0)
An = (8 − 2×1.0)(0.75) = 4.5 in² (two holes across the critical row).
φRn = 0.75(65)(4.5) = 219 kips ≥ 182.4 ✓

Step 5 — Compression Flange Plate Buckling (§E3)

Unbraced length between weld and first bolt row L ≈ 3 in; r = t/√12 = 0.75/3.46 = 0.217 in; KL/r = 1.0(3)/0.217 = 13.8, well below 25 → Fcr ≈ Fy = 50 ksi (Eq. E3-2).
φPn = 0.90(50)(6.0) = 270 kips ≥ 182.4 ✓ — plate does not govern in compression.
Limit stateφRn (k)Status
Bolt shear (8 bolts)194Governs
Plate yielding270OK
Plate rupture219OK
Plate buckling (compression side)270OK
Use PL ¾×8 A572 Gr. 50 flange plates with 4 rows (8 total) of ⅞-in A325-SC bolts each flange. Bolt shear governs, DCR = 182.4/194 = 0.94.
Common mistakes: checking bolts in double shear when the plate splice is actually single shear; forgetting to deduct 2 bolt holes (not 1) across the net section when bolts are staggered across the plate width; neglecting the short compression-plate buckling check even though it rarely governs.

Worked Example 15.3 — Panel-Zone Shear & Doubler Plate

Adapted from AISC 360-22 §J10.6 and AISC Design Guide 13 doubler-plate procedure.

Given

  • Column: W14×90, A992. dc=14.0 in, tw=0.440 in, bcf=14.5 in, tcf=0.710 in.
  • Beams both sides: W24×68, db=23.7 in, tf=0.585 in.
  • Mu,L = 380 k-ft, Mu,R = 340 k-ft (interior joint, both moments create panel-zone shear in the same sense).
Ex 15.3 — Panel-Zone Shear & Doubler Plate, Interior JointW14×90 column, W24×68 beams both sides, M_u,L = 380 k-ft, M_u,R = 340 k-ft
Figure 15.3a — Interior joint: flange forces from both beams load the same panel zone.

Step 1 — Flange Forces

Puf,L = 380(12)/(23.7−0.585) = 4560/23.12 = 197.2 k
Puf,R = 340(12)/23.12 = 176.5 k

Step 2 — Panel-Zone Shear Demand

Approximate demand, interior joint (ignoring column shear contribution)Vpz ≈ Puf,L + Puf,R
Vpz = 197.2 + 176.5 = 373.7 kips

Step 3 — Check Whether Web Restraint Term Applies

Need Pr/Pc ≤ 0.4 to use Eq. J10-9/11 without axial-load reduction — assume satisfied (gravity column axial load is low relative to Pc at this joint).

Step 4 — Panel-Zone Capacity, Bare Column Web (Eq. J10-11)

Eq. J10-11, φv=0.90Rn = 0.60Fydctw[1 + 3bcftcf²/(dbdctw)]
Base term: 0.60(50)(14.0)(0.440) = 184.8 k
Bracket: 1 + 3(14.5)(0.710)²/(23.7×14.0×0.440) = 1 + 3(14.5)(0.504)/(146.1) = 1 + 0.150 = 1.150
Rn = 184.8(1.150) = 212.5 k; φRn = 0.90(212.5) = 191.3 kips < 373.7 NG — doubler plate required

Step 5 — Required Doubler Plate Thickness

Composite web thickness neededtw,req = Vpz / [φv·0.60Fydc·(bracket ≈1.15)]
tw,req = 373.7 / [0.90(0.60)(50)(14.0)(1.15)] = 373.7/434.7 = 0.860 in
td,req = tw,req − tw = 0.860 − 0.440 = 0.42 in → use 7/16-in doubler plate (one side) or two 1/4-in plates (both sides).
Bare column web is inadequate for the combined panel-zone shear (DCR = 373.7/191.3 = 1.95); add a 7/16-in A572 Gr. 50 doubler plate (or two ¼-in plates, one each side) to bring composite capacity above 373.7 kips.
Common mistakes: forgetting that interior-joint panel-zone demand adds flange forces from both beams (not just the larger one); using only Eq. J10-9 and skipping the flange-restraint bracket term of Eq. J10-11, which is unconservative to omit; specifying a doubler plate thinner than the actual deficit tw,req − tw.

Worked Example 15.4 — Four-Bolt Extended End-Plate: Bolt Tension with Prying & Plate Thickness

Adapted from AISC 358 Chapter 6 (4E unstiffened extended end-plate) design procedure.

Given

  • Beam: W18×50, A992. d=17.99 in, tf=0.57 in, bf=7.50 in.
  • Mu = 260 k-ft at the plastic hinge / column face.
  • End-plate: A572 Gr. 50, 4 bolts (2 above tension flange), 1-in A490-N bolts, pf = 2.0 in, bolt gage g = 5.5 in, distance from bolt to plate edge = 1.5 in.
Ex 15.4 — 4-Bolt Extended Unstiffened End-Plate (4E)W18×50 beam, M_u = 260 k-ft; 4 × 1-in A490 bolts, prying check
Figure 15.4a — 4-bolt extended end-plate (4E), bolts outside the tension flange only.

Step 1 — Flange Force

Puf = Mu / (d − tf)
Puf = 260(12) / (17.99 − 0.57) = 3120/17.42 = 179.1 kips

Step 2 — Bolt Tension Demand (2 bolts resist the flange force)

Tu = Puf / nb
Tu = 179.1 / 2 = 89.6 kips/bolt before prying amplification.

Step 3 — Bolt Tension Capacity, Steel (Eq. J3-1)

φ=0.75, Fnt=113 ksi (A490-N), Ab=0.785 in²φRn = φFntAb
φRn = 0.75(113)(0.785) = 66.5 kips < 89.6 — must account for prying reduction of the effective demand; check prying using AISC Manual Part 9.

Step 4 — Prying Action (AISC Manual Part 9)

Manual Eq. 9-27 through 9-30b′=b−db/2; a′=min(a,1.25b)+db/2; ρ=b′/a′; δ=1−d′/p; α′=[1/(δ(1+ρ))]·[(B/Tu)−1]
b = pf − tf/2 = 2.0 − 0.285 = 1.715 in; b′ = 1.715 − 0.5 = 1.215 in.
a = edge dist − pf = 1.5 in (extension beyond bolt line, taken ≤ 1.25b = 2.14): a′ = 1.5 + 0.5 = 2.0 in.
ρ = b′/a′ = 1.215/2.0 = 0.608.
p (trib. width per bolt) = g/2 + edge = 3.75 in; d′ = bolt hole dia = 1.0+1/16 = 1.0625 in; δ = 1 − 1.0625/3.75 = 0.717.
B = φRn (bolt tensile strength) = 66.5 k.
Try tp = 1.0 in (A572 Gr. 50): required tc = √(4Bb′/(pFu,p)) = √(4(66.5)(1.215)/(3.75×65)) = √(323.2/243.75) = √1.326 = 1.151 in.
α′ = (1/(δ(1+ρ)))·[(tc/tp)² − 1] = (1/(0.717×1.608))·[(1.151/1.0)² − 1] = (1/1.153)(0.325) = 0.282, capped 0 ≤ α′ ≤ 1 → α′ = 0.282.
Q = (tp/tc)²(1+δα′)·B = (1.0/1.151)²(1+0.717×0.282)(66.5) = 0.755(1.202)(66.5) = 60.4 kips prying force.
Effective demand including pryingTu,eff = Tu (bolt must supply Tu+Q ≤ B)
Check: B ≥ Tu is the governing form once tp ≥ tc is not satisfied (tp=1.0 < tc=1.151), so prying does reduce available capacity: φBeff = 66.5/(1+δα′) inverted per Manual 9-31 → try tp = 1.25 in instead.
With tp = 1.25 in ≥ tc = 1.151 in, α′ → 0 (no prying, "thick plate"): available bolt tension = φRn = 66.5 k per bolt. Two bolts share the flange force only if 2×66.5 = 133 k ≥ 179.1 k — NG; must add 2 more bolts (4 total resisting tension) or upsize bolts to 1⅛ in.
Upsize to 1⅛-in A490-N: Ab=0.994 in²; φRn = 0.75(113)(0.994) = 84.2 k/bolt; 2 bolts → 168.4 k, still < 179.1. Use 4-bolt configuration with 1⅛-in A490-N (8-bolt-pattern, 4ES): Tu = 179.1/4 = 44.8 k/bolt ≪ 84.2 k/bolt ✓.

Step 5 — End-Plate Thickness by Yield-Line Theory

AISC 358 Eq. 6.9-11tp,req = √(1.11γrPufpf / (φFpyYp))
Yp (4ES geometry, Table 6.4) ≈ 70 in for this beam depth; γr=1.0, φ=0.90.
tp,req = √(1.11×1.0×179.1×2.0 / (0.90×50×70)) = √(397.6/3150) = √0.1262 = 0.355 in → controlled instead by the bolt-thickness requirement above; use tp = 1¼ in (bolt/prying governs over yield-line flexure for this deep, heavily loaded joint).
Limit stateRequiredProvidedStatus
Bolt tension (per bolt, no prying)44.8 k84.2 k (1⅛ in A490-N)OK
End-plate thickness, yield line0.355 in1.25 inOK (bolt-governed)
Thick-plate/no-prying check (tp ≥ tc)tc ≈ 1.15 in1.25 inOK
Use AISC 358 4ES-equivalent 8-bolt extended stiffened end-plate with 1⅛-in A490-N bolts and a 1¼-in A572 Gr. 50 end plate — plate thickness satisfies the "thick plate, no prying" criterion, forcing ductility into the beam rather than the connection.

Engineering interpretation. The initial 4-bolt/1-in-bolt/1-in-plate trial failed twice — first on raw bolt tension capacity, then on the thick-plate prying criterion — illustrating why end-plate design is iterative: bolt count, bolt diameter, and plate thickness must all be resolved together.

Common mistakes: applying the yield-line tp,req formula and stopping there without checking whether tp ≥ tc (the "no-prying" thick-plate criterion) — a plate that satisfies flexure can still allow damaging prying forces in the bolts; forgetting the prying force Q reduces the bolt's net available capacity for the applied load.

FE-Style Worked Examples(6)

Each example mirrors the NCEES FE Civil Reference Handbook style: brief givens, a labeled figure, AISC section reference, step-by-step numeric solution, and a single boxed answer.

Given
Beam Mu=300 k-ft, d≈18 in.
AISC Reference
AISC §J10 / Manual Part 12
Step-by-step solution
  1. Fpr
    Mu/(d − tf) = 300×12/(18 − 0.5) = 206 k (flange tension or compression)
Answer Each flange transmits ~206 k.
Flange force from beam moment
Problem statement image
Mu, VuBolted FR moment connection
DIMDimensions from the problem statement
Mu = 300k
Moment connection — beam to column
  • Flange forces P_f = M / (d − t_f) transferred through welds/bolts
  • Column panel-zone shear = M / d_c (check per §J10)
  • Continuity plates required if column flange too thin

Graded Chapter Quiz(13 FE-style questions · AISC Manual required)

These questions reference AISC Steel Construction Manual (16th ed.) — sections, equations, and tables are cited explicitly. Use a calculator. Each question offers a clue you may reveal before answering. Submissions are recorded to your account once signed in.

C15-01AISC 358-22
1. AISC 358 covers:
FR moment connection · flange plates col. top flange PL bottom flange PL Mu
C15-02AISC 358-22 Ch. 5
2. Reduced beam section (RBS) 'dogbone' moved plastic hinge:
C15-03AISC 358-22 Ch. 7
3. Bolted flange plate (BFP) connection strength governed by:
FR moment connection · flange plates col. top flange PL bottom flange PL Mu
C15-04AISC 358-22 Ch. 6
4. Extended end-plate moment connection: bolt-force distribution:
FR moment connection · flange plates col. top flange PL bottom flange PL Mu
C15-05AISC 360-22 Eq. J10-11
5. Panel zone shear strength (§J10.6):
FR moment connection · flange plates col. top flange PL bottom flange PL Mu
C15-06AISC 360-22 §J10.6
6. Doubler plate needed if panel zone Vu >:
C15-07AISC 360-22 Eq. J10-1
7. Column flange bending due to concentrated tension (beam flange force):
C15-08AISC 360-22 §J10
8. Continuity plates (transverse stiffeners at column) sized for:
C15-09AISC 358-22 §5.8
9. Prequalified RBS parameters a, b, c per AISC 358 §5.8:
FR moment connection · flange plates col. top flange PL bottom flange PL Mu
C15-10AISC 360-22 §I2
10. Composite moment connection design: rebar and stud contribution:
C15-11AISC Manual Part 12
11. Web-plate splice designed for:
C15-12AISC 358 & FEMA 350
12. Directly welded flange moment connection: fracture typically initiates at:
C15-13AISC 358-22 Ch. 6
13. End-plate thickness for 4E extended end plate (Manual Part 12):

Upload your worked solution (PDF)

Attach your handwritten or typed step-by-step solution for this chapter's graded quiz. The instructor can download every submission. PDF only, up to 25 MB.

How your upload will be graded

Your file — PDF, Word document, scanned handwriting or a photo — is read page by page like an experienced structural engineering instructor would. The scan is validated first, then your reasoning, structural model, calculations, diagrams, code basis and final answers are graded on process, not just the final number. Design work is additionally reviewed against AISC 360-22 and ACI 318-19. Partial credit applies, and one early mistake carried correctly forward is only penalized once.

Before you attach the file
  • Include every page, in order and right way up — a missing page cannot earn credit.
  • Keep margins in frame: nothing cropped at the edges, especially boxed final answers.
  • Scan or photograph in good, even light — no shadows, glare or blur; 300 dpi or a steady phone scan.
  • Write in dark pen; faint pencil is the most common 'UNREADABLE — INSTRUCTOR REVIEW REQUIRED' flag.
  • Include all diagrams, FBDs, shear/moment diagrams and section sketches — label them.
  • Number each question the same way the assignment does, and note anything you skipped.
  • Show units on every line and box your final answers.
  • Combine everything into ONE file (PDF preferred; Word, JPG or PNG accepted) under 20 MB.
Sign in to upload your worked solution.
§11Section 11

Chapter summary

Formula sheet
  • Design strength
    φ Rn ≥ Ru
    AISC 360-22 B3.1
Engineering checklist
  • Module 15: Moment Connections
  • Key limit states and AISC references are listed in the reference box.
  • Use φRn ≥ Ru for every check.
  • Verify section properties with the official AISC Manual.
Professional tips
  • • Mixing ASD and LRFD load combinations in the same problem.
  • • Using nominal strength Rn instead of design strength φRn.
  • • Forgetting to check every limit state listed in the AISC chapter.
§13Section 13

FE exam preparation

FE exam preparation
Concept review
Concept summary coming soon.
Calculator tips

Calculator tips coming soon.

Common exam traps

Traps coming soon.

Time management

Aim for ~3 minutes per FE problem; skip and return to any item that takes longer than 5 minutes.